val/irctest
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/progval/irctest.git synced 2025-04-04 14:29:46 +00:00
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Merge 6243908ecc2d11864b183101429f36121f4fe378 into aaa2e26b6e468112665ad7b15d144574a969b411

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
Val Lorentz
2024-06-24 11:42:41 -04:00
committed by GitHub
parent aaa2e26b6e 6243908ecc
commit e50cac1a39
1 changed files with 85 additions and 61 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

146
irctest/server_tests/sasl.py
View File

@ -1,4 +1,5 @@
import base64
from typing import List
from irctest import cases, runner, scram
from irctest.numerics import ERR_SASLFAIL, RPL_LOGGEDIN, RPL_SASLMECHS
@ -11,8 +12,34 @@ class RegistrationTestCase(cases.BaseServerTestCase):
self.controller.registerUser(self, "testuser", "mypassword")
@cases.mark_services
class SaslTestCase(cases.BaseServerTestCase):
class _BaseSasl(cases.BaseServerTestCase):
sasl_ir: bool
capabilities: List[str]
def _doInitialExchange(self, client, mechanism: str, chunk: str):
"""Does the initial C->S, S->C, C->S exchange.
With ``sasl_ir=False``, this is done with the usual three messages exchange
(``AUTHENTICATE <mechanism>``, ``AUTHENTICATE +``, ``AUTHENTICATE <chunk>``)
with ``sasl_ir=True``, this is done in a single C->S message
(``AUTHENTICATE <mechanism> <chunk>``)
See the [sasl-ir spec](https://github.com/ircv3/ircv3-specifications/pull/520)
"""
if self.sasl_ir:
self.sendLine(client, f"AUTHENTICATE {mechanism} {chunk}")
else:
self.sendLine(client, f"AUTHENTICATE {mechanism}")
m = self.getRegistrationMessage(1)
self.assertMessageMatch(
m,
command="AUTHENTICATE",
params=["+"],
fail_msg=f"Sent “AUTHENTICATE {mechanism}”, server should have "
f"replied with “AUTHENTICATE +”, but instead sent: {{msg}}",
)
self.sendLine(client, f"AUTHENTICATE {chunk}")
@cases.mark_specifications("IRCv3")
@cases.skipUnlessHasMechanism("PLAIN")
def testPlain(self):
@ -34,17 +61,8 @@ class SaslTestCase(cases.BaseServerTestCase):
capabilities["sasl"],
fail_msg="Does not have PLAIN mechanism as the controller " "claims",
)
self.requestCapabilities(1, ["sasl"], skip_if_cap_nak=False)
self.sendLine(1, "AUTHENTICATE PLAIN")
m = self.getRegistrationMessage(1)
self.assertMessageMatch(
m,
command="AUTHENTICATE",
params=["+"],
fail_msg="Sent “AUTHENTICATE PLAIN”, server should have "
"replied with “AUTHENTICATE +”, but instead sent: {msg}",
)
self.sendLine(1, "AUTHENTICATE amlsbGVzAGppbGxlcwBzZXNhbWU=")
self.requestCapabilities(1, self.capabilities, skip_if_cap_nak=False)
self._doInitialExchange(1, "PLAIN", "amlsbGVzAGppbGxlcwBzZXNhbWU=")
m = self.getRegistrationMessage(1)
self.assertMessageMatch(
m,
@ -88,17 +106,8 @@ class SaslTestCase(cases.BaseServerTestCase):
).decode()
self.controller.registerUser(self, "foo", password)
self.addClient()
self.requestCapabilities(1, ["sasl"], skip_if_cap_nak=False)
self.sendLine(1, "AUTHENTICATE PLAIN")
m = self.getRegistrationMessage(1)
self.assertMessageMatch(
m,
command="AUTHENTICATE",
params=["+"],
fail_msg="Sent “AUTHENTICATE PLAIN”, server should have "
"replied with “AUTHENTICATE +”, but instead sent: {msg}",
)
self.sendLine(1, "AUTHENTICATE " + authstring)
self.requestCapabilities(1, self.capabilities, skip_if_cap_nak=False)
self._doInitialExchange(1, "PLAIN", authstring)
m = self.getRegistrationMessage(1)
self.assertMessageMatch(
m,
@ -148,17 +157,8 @@ class SaslTestCase(cases.BaseServerTestCase):
capabilities["sasl"],
fail_msg="Does not have PLAIN mechanism as the controller " "claims",
)
self.requestCapabilities(1, ["sasl"], skip_if_cap_nak=False)
self.sendLine(1, "AUTHENTICATE PLAIN")
m = self.getRegistrationMessage(1)
self.assertMessageMatch(
m,
command="AUTHENTICATE",
params=["+"],
fail_msg="Sent “AUTHENTICATE PLAIN”, server should have "
"replied with “AUTHENTICATE +”, but instead sent: {msg}",
)
self.sendLine(1, "AUTHENTICATE AGppbGxlcwBzZXNhbWU=")
self.requestCapabilities(1, self.capabilities, skip_if_cap_nak=False)
self._doInitialExchange(1, "PLAIN", "AGppbGxlcwBzZXNhbWU=")
m = self.getRegistrationMessage(1)
self.assertMessageMatch(
m,
@ -184,8 +184,11 @@ class SaslTestCase(cases.BaseServerTestCase):
capabilities,
fail_msg="Does not have SASL as the controller claims.",
)
self.requestCapabilities(1, ["sasl"], skip_if_cap_nak=False)
self.sendLine(1, "AUTHENTICATE FOO")
self.requestCapabilities(1, self.capabilities, skip_if_cap_nak=False)
if self.sasl_ir:
self.sendLine(1, "AUTHENTICATE FOO AGppbGxlcwBzZXNhbWU=")
else:
self.sendLine(1, "AUTHENTICATE FOO")
m = self.getRegistrationMessage(1)
while m.command == RPL_SASLMECHS:
m = self.getRegistrationMessage(1)
@ -235,17 +238,8 @@ class SaslTestCase(cases.BaseServerTestCase):
capabilities["sasl"],
fail_msg="Does not have PLAIN mechanism as the controller " "claims",
)
self.requestCapabilities(1, ["sasl"], skip_if_cap_nak=False)
self.sendLine(1, "AUTHENTICATE PLAIN")
m = self.getRegistrationMessage(1)
self.assertMessageMatch(
m,
command="AUTHENTICATE",
params=["+"],
fail_msg="Sent “AUTHENTICATE PLAIN”, expected "
"“AUTHENTICATE +” as a response, but got: {msg}",
)
self.sendLine(1, "AUTHENTICATE {}".format(authstring[0:400]))
self.requestCapabilities(1, self.capabilities, skip_if_cap_nak=False)
self._doInitialExchange(1, "PLAIN", authstring[0:400])
self.sendLine(1, "AUTHENTICATE {}".format(authstring[400:]))
self.confirmSuccessfulAuth()
@ -305,17 +299,8 @@ class SaslTestCase(cases.BaseServerTestCase):
capabilities["sasl"],
fail_msg="Does not have PLAIN mechanism as the controller " "claims",
)
self.requestCapabilities(1, ["sasl"], skip_if_cap_nak=False)
self.sendLine(1, "AUTHENTICATE PLAIN")
m = self.getRegistrationMessage(1)
self.assertMessageMatch(
m,
command="AUTHENTICATE",
params=["+"],
fail_msg="Sent “AUTHENTICATE PLAIN”, expected "
"“AUTHENTICATE +” as a response, but got: {msg}",
)
self.sendLine(1, "AUTHENTICATE {}".format(authstring))
self.requestCapabilities(1, self.capabilities, skip_if_cap_nak=False)
self._doInitialExchange(1, "PLAIN", authstring)
self.sendLine(1, "AUTHENTICATE +")
self.confirmSuccessfulAuth()
@ -324,6 +309,12 @@ class SaslTestCase(cases.BaseServerTestCase):
# I don't know how to do it, because it would make the registration
# message's length too big for it to be valid.
@cases.mark_services
class SaslTestCase(_BaseSasl):
sasl_ir = False
capabilities = ["sasl"]
@cases.mark_specifications("IRCv3")
@cases.skipUnlessHasMechanism("SCRAM-SHA-256")
def testScramSha256Success(self):
@ -344,7 +335,7 @@ class SaslTestCase(cases.BaseServerTestCase):
fail_msg="Does not have SCRAM-SHA-256 mechanism as the "
"controller claims",
)
self.requestCapabilities(1, ["sasl"], skip_if_cap_nak=False)
self.requestCapabilities(1, self.capabilities, skip_if_cap_nak=False)
self.sendLine(1, "AUTHENTICATE SCRAM-SHA-256")
m = self.getRegistrationMessage(1)
@ -400,7 +391,7 @@ class SaslTestCase(cases.BaseServerTestCase):
fail_msg="Does not have SCRAM-SHA-256 mechanism as the "
"controller claims",
)
self.requestCapabilities(1, ["sasl"], skip_if_cap_nak=False)
self.requestCapabilities(1, self.capabilities, skip_if_cap_nak=False)
self.sendLine(1, "AUTHENTICATE SCRAM-SHA-256")
m = self.getRegistrationMessage(1)
@ -430,3 +421,36 @@ class SaslTestCase(cases.BaseServerTestCase):
)
m = self.getRegistrationMessage(1)
self.assertMessageMatch(m, command=ERR_SASLFAIL)
@cases.mark_services
class SaslIrTestCase(_BaseSasl):
"""Tests SASL with clients requesting the
[sasl-ir](https://github.com/ircv3/ircv3-specifications/pull/520) cap and using it.
"""
sasl_ir = True
capabilities = ["sasl", "draft/sasl-ir"]
def setUp(self):
super().setUp()
self.connectClient(
"capgetter", capabilities=["draft/sasl-ir"], skip_if_cap_nak=True
)
@cases.mark_services
class ImplicitSaslIrTestCase(_BaseSasl):
"""Tests SASL with clients using the
[sasl-ir](https://github.com/ircv3/ircv3-specifications/pull/520) CAP without
requesting it.
"""
sasl_ir = True
capabilities = ["sasl"]
def setUp(self):
super().setUp()
self.connectClient(
"capgetter", capabilities=["draft/sasl-ir"], skip_if_cap_nak=True
)